Social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against conspiracy theories ahead of the 2024 presidential election.

  • Andy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think we need to pursue a strategy that attempts to discourage the spread of disinformation while avoiding making them the arbiters of truth.

    I think social media platforms are like a giant food court. If you do nothing to discourage the spread of germs, your salad bar and buffets are all going to be petri dishes of human pathogens. That doesn’t mean that the food court needs to put in hospital-level sterilization measures. It just means that the FDA requires restaurants to use dishwashers that get up to 71 C, and employees are required to wash their hands.

    In this case, I think we should experiment. What if platforms were required to let users flag something as disinformation, and share a credible source if they like? Maybe users could see all the flags and upvote or downvote them. The information would still be there, but you’d go to the InfoWars page and it would say, “Hey: You should know that 95% of people say this page posts mostly bullshit.”

    Something like that. I don’t like the role the companies play currently, but disinformation does carry the potential to cause serious harm.

    • @rootA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -41 year ago

      Remember when social media was deleting news stories about a certain laptop?

      • Andy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Yes?

        I can’t tell if you’re agreeing with me or not.

      • @Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I am also against deleting valid news about wrongdoing for Democrats, if you’re implying this stance is political in some way.